Editorial policy

We wrote this page so you can see our method for yourself: how a number gets checked, how often we look again, and what we do after a correction. The about page covers who runs the site, and the affiliate disclosure covers what we earn from a click.

How we research a page

  1. We log in for real. One Australia-registered SugarDaddyMeet account is how we see the gallery, the search filters and the renewal page, rather than guessing from the marketing site.
  2. Read-only, always. We change search filters and scroll through results. We don't open individual profiles, message anyone, or save a username or a bio anywhere in our notes.
  3. We count and date, we don't estimate. A figure about who is on the platform states how many profiles we counted, on what date, under which filter, never a guess at a total.
  4. Every claim gets a label. A number from SugarDaddyMeet's own marketing is marked as the platform's claim. A number we counted ourselves is marked as our sample, and the two never get blended into one line.
  5. The downside goes on the page. Nothing here goes live until it names what costs money, what sits behind a paid tier, or what the platform simply doesn't do well.

Three layers of price, one rule

Subscription prices on this site come in three layers: the public price list, the different figure our own account was shown on its renewal page, and what other members report paying. Every price we quote says which of the three it is. Whatever those three layers show, the number on your own checkout page when you actually pay is the one that counts, not any figure printed here.

Samples, not membership totals

Two figures come up often on this site: 237 women's profiles and 218 men's profiles, both read from the gallery on 20 and 21 September 2026 with the filter set to Australia. Those are sample sizes, the number of cards the gallery served before we stopped scrolling, not a count of everyone registered in the country. Where the gallery kept serving cards past the point we stopped, we say "at least" rather than pretend we found the edge of it.

Where legal and safety claims point

Anything about the law, tax or online safety links straight to the Australian body that said it, such as the Australian Taxation Office, the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner or the eSafety Commissioner, rather than to somebody else's summary of it. Our legal guide is the clearest example of this in practice.

Corrections

When we get something wrong, we fix the page and note what changed rather than edit it quietly. Tell us what you saw and where at the contact page, and we will check it before we touch anything.